The conversation managers keep putting off
When conflict arises with a direct report, 35% of managers do nothing about it. This guide for HR and people leaders covers why managers avoid the difficult conversation, the conversations that get ducked most and how to have them well before a small issue becomes a formal one.
When conflict came up with a direct report, 35% of managers said they did nothing in response, higher than the 19% of people reporting conflict. Acas links this to managers’ low confidence in dealing with conflict. Acas, 2025
Enter your details to read the full guide
The rest of the guide covers why managers avoid the difficult conversation, the conversations that get ducked most often and how to prepare for, open and close the conversation well. One-off, you won’t need to do this again on this device.
Why managers avoid the difficult conversation
Most managers know what needs saying. They put it off anyway. Avoidance is rarely a one-off choice. It is a habit built from a fear of making things worse, and the quiet relief of leaving it for another day.
The fear of making it worse
The conversation feels risky. A manager worries they will say the wrong thing, damage the relationship, trigger an upset or a complaint or be accused of being unfair. Doing nothing feels safer than doing it badly. So the conversation gets postponed, and each delay makes the next attempt feel harder still.
The quiet cost of waiting
Avoidance has a price, it just lands later. The performance issue settles in. The pattern hardens. The rest of the team notices it is being tolerated. What could have been a quiet word becomes a formal process. The conversation was never going to get easier by waiting. It only got bigger.
When conflict arose with a direct report, 35% of managers did nothing, compared with 19% of people reporting conflict. Acas links this to managers’ low confidence in dealing with conflict. Acas, 2025
Giving someone time and space is a reasonable choice. Hoping a problem will fix itself so you never have to raise it is not. The difference is intent. Patience has a plan and a point at which you will act. Avoidance just keeps moving the line. If you cannot say when you would step in, the conversation is being ducked rather than deferred.
The conversations that get ducked most
Some conversations get put off more than others. They are the ones where the manager has to name something uncomfortable about a person they work with every day. Three come up again and again.
The performance dip
Someone who was reliable has slipped. The work is late, the quality is down or the standard has quietly dropped. It feels awkward to raise because they used to be good, and the manager does not want to dent their confidence or seem ungrateful for past work.
- Why it gets avoided: the manager fears the person will be hurt or demoralised, so the slip is excused as a rough patch.
- What waiting does: the lower standard becomes the new normal, and raising it later looks like it came out of nowhere.
Attendance and lateness
The odd late start, the regular long lunch, the day off that always seems to land on a Friday. Each instance is small, which is exactly why it is easy to let slide. The manager tells themselves it is not worth a conversation, until the pattern is obvious to everyone.
- Why it gets avoided: any single instance feels too minor to mention, so the manager waits for a bigger one that justifies it.
- What waiting does: the team sees it tolerated for one person, and fairness across everyone else quietly erodes.
The “are you okay” wellbeing conversation
Someone seems off. They are withdrawn, short with people or visibly struggling. The manager senses something is wrong but does not know what to say, worries about prying or making it worse, and is unsure whether it is their place to ask at all. So they say nothing and hope it passes.
- Why it gets avoided: the manager fears opening something they cannot handle, or being told it is none of their business.
- What waiting does: a person who needed a check-in early is left to cope alone until it shows up in their work or their absence.
How to have the conversation well
The skill is not bluntness, and it is not softening it until the point disappears. It is structure. A conversation that is prepared, opened cleanly and closed properly is far less likely to go wrong, and far more likely to actually change something.
Prepare before you walk in
Most conversations go badly because they were improvised. Know the specific thing you want to address, the examples that show it and the outcome you are aiming for. Walking in with a plan is the single biggest difference between a conversation that lands and one that spirals.
- Be clear on the one thing this conversation is about. Trying to cover everything at once is how it turns into a pile-on.
- Decide what a good outcome looks like before you start, so you know what you are steering towards.
Open without ambushing
How you open sets the tone for the whole conversation. Name the topic plainly and early, so the person is not blindsided and does not spend the first ten minutes wondering where this is going. Direct and respectful beats vague and drawn out.
- Say what the conversation is about in the first minute. Burying it makes the person more defensive, not less.
- Choose the time and place. A quiet moment in private lands very differently to a corridor on a Friday afternoon.
Stay composed and listen
The moment it gets defensive is the moment most conversations are lost. Staying calm when the other person is not is a skill, and it keeps the conversation usable. So does listening properly, because the explanation often changes what the right next step is.
- If it heats up, slow down rather than match it. A pause and a steady tone de-escalate faster than a counter-argument.
- Listen to understand, not just to reply. There may be a reason behind the behaviour that you need to hear.
Agree clear next steps and follow up
A conversation that ends in a vague “let’s see how it goes” has not really happened. Close it with something specific, agreed by both people, with a date to check back in. The follow-up is what turns the conversation into a change rather than a one-off chat.
- End with a clear, shared agreement on what changes and by when. Ambiguity now means the same conversation again later.
- Book the follow-up before you leave the room. Checking back in is what holds the accountability in place.
Q3 is usually quieter, which makes it the right window to give managers the confidence to have these conversations. Build the capability now and it is ready for the autumn run-up, when performance reviews, workload and the conversations that have been left all tend to land at once.
Give your managers the confidence to have the hard conversation
Our Difficult Conversations training gives managers a structure to prepare, open, stay composed and close the conversation properly, with role-play and live practice so they have actually done it before they have to. The issue was never going to fix itself by waiting.
Enquire about Difficult Conversations training